Miky_asc Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Le 22/01/2026 à 16:31, CaptainWilshere a dit : On va passer 1er en 2026 ! Nous sommes dans une période fast, les investissements nous ont permis d'améliorer notre effectif et nos contrats de sponsoring. La rénovation du stade avec ajout de 10k places fait sens, ils vont faire un stade comme le Bernabeu high tech! La rénovation du stade est officiel ? Parce que a part des projets j'ai rien vue sur le sujet A vaincre sans périls, on triomphe sans Gloire ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lô le gunners Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 Pelé:"He is the best player in the world; He has just been a little unlucky in the past."; Maradona: "Totti is the world's number one" ; Mourinho: "He's the best player in the Italian championship in terms of spectacle and quality of play." Ferguson: "Totti is the fantastic player"; Wenger: "Totti is a top, top class player. He used to play in behind the strikers and then one day they had no central striker so they played him up front and won game after game. He suddenly became the topscorer in Italy as a central striker. That means this guy has absolutely everything" Platini: " Totti est un artiste du football. Son seul défaut est d'être romain." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkyMan Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 il y a 1 minute, lô le gunners a dit : Je ne pensais pas qu'il y avait un si grand écart entre Saliba et Gabriel. Je sais que Wilo a prolongé récemment et qu'il fallait blinder son contrat, mais quand même. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sinestro Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 Jesus et Havertz ça mange beaucoup trop bien pour le rôle/fame qu'ils ont Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neodraken Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 il y a 34 minutes, sinestro a dit : Jesus et Havertz ça mange beaucoup trop bien pour le rôle/fame qu'ils ont Mais de toutes les façons, ils ont négociés pour ça. Gabriel Jesus quitte le leader Manchester City pour jouer dans une equipe qui termine 5e et joue l'Europa League. Il fallait bien une carotte pour le faire venir (comme n'importe quel salarié qui est débauché d'une autre entreprise). insta : @multimedianewsfr fb : https://www.facebook.com/multimedianews972 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sinestro Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 il y a 34 minutes, Neodraken a dit : Mais de toutes les façons, ils ont négociés pour ça. Gabriel Jesus quitte le leader Manchester City pour jouer dans une equipe qui termine 5e et joue l'Europa League. Il fallait bien une carotte pour le faire venir (comme n'importe quel salarié qui est débauché d'une autre entreprise). Oui, évidemment, GG à eux. Mais ça me pique de voir ça.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arsenewho Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 Jesus , il va partir si on regarde le salaire / rendement , qui sont bcp trop déséquilibrés. havertz , il a une chance encore , mais il est dans le viseur je pense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neodraken Posted February 26 Share Posted February 26 insta : @multimedianewsfr fb : https://www.facebook.com/multimedianews972 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Pan Posted February 26 Share Posted February 26 Je ne comprends pas pourquoi Tottenham est si haut Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred76ers Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 Ça c’est impressionnant également… la prochaine fois que Chelsea se targuera d’avoir un net spend meilleur qu’Arsenal la prochaine… leur résultat démontre bien que le net spend isolé ne veut rien dire. Arsenal a 2M de perte sur 2025 [img]http://gifrific.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/2mi5v.gif[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neodraken Posted March 10 Share Posted March 10 insta : @multimedianewsfr fb : https://www.facebook.com/multimedianews972 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neodraken Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 insta : @multimedianewsfr fb : https://www.facebook.com/multimedianews972 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOURM3T Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 (edited) 6,5M "seulement", ça me paraît peu pour une victoire dans le match de foot qui doit compter le plus de téléspectateurs dans le monde, juste derrière la finale de Coupe du Monde peut être edit: ok au vu de la première image, c’est le bonus pour la victoire et une présence en finale semble valoir environ 25M. Edited May 6 by GOURM3T Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neodraken Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 il y a 1 minute, GOURM3T a dit : 6,5M "seulement", ça me paraît peu pour une victoire dans le match de foot qui doit compter le plus de téléspectateurs dans le monde, juste derrière la finale de Coupe du Monde peut être Ceci dit la carabao cup c'est plutot 100 000 et la FA Cup, 2M. Ce qui compte c'est l'ensemble du parcours. insta : @multimedianewsfr fb : https://www.facebook.com/multimedianews972 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neodraken Posted May 7 Share Posted May 7 Un ancien tweet que je mets là, que j'ai pas eu le temps de tout lire vu qu'il est assez long et qui est remonté dans mon feed. Citation The concept of "Net Spend" in football refers to the balance between a club's spending on new players (transfer fees paid) and the revenue generated from player sales (transfer fees received). On the surface, it appears to be a straightforward metric to gauge a club's financial efficiency in the transfer market. However, several factors make the idea of net spend somewhat misleading or a "myth" in the context of assessing a football club's financial health and performance. Here are some key reasons: 1. Wages and Contract Lengths: - Transfer fees are just one component of a club's expenditure on players. Salaries, signing bonuses, and agent fees also constitute significant financial commitments. A club might have a low net spend but could still be burdened with high wage bills, which impacts its overall financial health - The length of player contracts affects how transfer fees and wages are amortized over time. Clubs might pay large fees for players but spread these costs over several years, affecting financial statements differently than net spend figures suggest. 2. Player Development and Youth Academies: - Clubs investing heavily in youth development might have lower net spends due to promoting players from their academy rather than buying new ones. This investment often goes unrecognized in net spend calculations. - Selling academy graduates can generate significant revenue, lowering the net spend but potentially not reflecting the actual investment in developing these players. 3. Revenue Generation: - Clubs with higher commercial revenues, matchday incomes, and broadcasting rights deals can afford higher net spends without jeopardizing their financial stability. Net spend doesn't account for the differing revenue streams and financial health of clubs. - Clubs in different leagues or those with different market sizes have varying capacities to spend. Comparing net spends across clubs without considering their revenue potential can be misleading. 4. Depreciation and Amortisation: - The accounting practices around player transfers, such as amortisation (spreading the cost of a transfer fee over the duration of the player's contract), affect how financial figures are reported. Net spend does not consider these accounting nuances, which can make a club's spending appear different from its actual financial impact. 5. Timing of Transactions: - The timing of player purchases and sales can distort net spend figures. A club might appear to have a high net spend in a particular transfer window but may balance this out over several windows. A single snapshot of net spend does not provide a comprehensive view of a club's transfer strategy. 6. Hidden Costs and Financial Management: - There are various hidden costs involved in transfers, including agent fees, legal costs, and performance-related bonuses, which are not reflected in net spend calculations. - Clubs may also engage in complex financial arrangements such as third-party ownership, buy-back clauses, and loan-to-buy deals, which can obscure the true financial picture. 7. Strategic and Competitive Factors: - Clubs might adopt different transfer strategies based on their competitive needs. Some clubs might prioritize short-term success with high spending, while others focus on long-term stability and gradual improvement. - The competitive environment of different leagues and the club's position within that environment (e.g., fighting for the title, avoiding relegation) can influence transfer spending patterns, making net spend an incomplete measure of strategic success. In summary, while net spend provides a simple and easily understood metric, it oversimplifies the complex financial landscape of football clubs. It fails to account for numerous factors that influence a club's financial and competitive position, thereby making it a somewhat mythic measure of financial health and transfer market efficiency. insta : @multimedianewsfr fb : https://www.facebook.com/multimedianews972 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts